PART XIVA (ART 323A – 323B)
Tribunals Quasi-Judicial Body
Tribunals
- Functions resemble that of court of law.
-Conducting hearings
-Making findings of facts
-Applying governing laws
-Drawing conclusions
Tribunals | Regular Courts |
Authorities outside the ordinary court system which interpret and apply the laws when acts of govt are challenged through formal suits or other established methods. | Controlled fact finding followed by controlled application of laws |
FEATURES
- Tribunals are quasi-judicial bodies.
- It is not a court of law, but enjoys some of the powers of a civil
court. - Generally free from rules of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 & Code
of Civil Procedure, 1908. - It can review its own decisions.
- Bound by the principles of natural justice.
Factors
- Increasing technicality of governance. E.g. NGT, TDSAT, etc.
- To provide inexpensive & quick justice.
- To provide relief to ordinary courts
Tribunals in India
- Constitutional Position – Art 136, 227
- Provisions – Part XIVA: Art 323A, 323B
- Art 323A – Tribunals for administrative matters
- Art 323B – Tribunals for other matters
Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985
- Provides for
- Central Administrative Tribunals (CAT) at central level
- State Administrative Tribunals (SAT) at state level
- Joint Administrative Tribunals (JAT) for 2 or more states
- Purpose – Deal with disputes/complaints w.r.t.
recruitments and conditions of services of civil
servants.
Composition
- Chairperson
- Vice Chairperson
- Judicial Members
- Administrative Members
Qualification
- Chairman – Former/sitting Judge of H C
- Judicial member – Former/sitting Judge of HC or
Secretary (GoI) (at least 2 years)/Add. Secretary (at least
5 years) in the Department of Legal Affairs. - Administrative member – Secretary (GoI/GoS)
for at least 2 years or Add. Secretary for at
least 5 years.
Appointment:
- By President in consultation with CJI/Governor
Term of Office: - C p – 5yrs/68 yrs.; Members – 5 yrs./65 yrs.
Conditions of Service: - Same as H C judge
Removal: - By President after enquiry by S C
L. Chandra Kumar judgment’97
- Awards of tribunals created
under Art 323A, 323B – Subject to judicial review of
HCs and SC.
Advantages
- Flexibility of procedure
- Provide efficiency in dispensing justice due to cost and
time effectiveness. - Unburdening of judiciary
- Specialisation through expert involvement
Problems in working of Tribunals
- Delays in disposal of disputes
- Violation of separation of powers
- Independence compromised
- Allegations of corruption
- Vacancies – Delays in appointments
- Lack of infrastructure
Tribunals Reforms Act 2021
- It dissolves certain existing appellate bodies and
transfers their functions (adjudication of appeals) to
other existing judicial bodies. (High Courts). E.g.,
-Airport Appellate Tribunal
-Appellate Board (under the Trademarks Act’99)
-Authority of Advanced Ruling
-Film Certification Appellate Tribunal etc.
Appointment of Chairpersons & Members
- Will be done by a search cum selection committee consisting of:
-Chairperson – CJI/Supreme Court Judge (with casting vote) - -2 Secretaries nominated by the central government
-Sitting/outgoing Chairperson, or a retired Supreme Court Judge, or a
retired Chief Justice of a High Court
– Secretary of the Ministry under which the Tribunal
is constituted (with no voting right). - The committee should forward 2 names for each
post and the government would take a decision
‘preferably’ within 3 months.
Conditions for Members
- Minimum age for being appointed Cm/Member = 50 yrs.
- Term of office:
- Chairperson – 4 years/70 years (whichever is earlier).
- Members – 4 years/67 years (whichever is earlier).
- Eligible for reappointment
Note: The provisions w.r.t. tenure & minimum
age which were introduced via Ordinance were
struck down by S C (July’2021).
Issues
- Short tenure of members along with provisions of reappointment increases the influence and control of
the Executive over the judiciary. - The provision of minimum age of 50 years forms a
part of restrictive qualifications. - Abolishing certain existing appellate bodies and
transferring their functions to HCs may further
increase the disposal time for cases.
Note: The S C is yet to decide whether the Tribunals Reforms
Act, 2021 is unconstitutional for re-enacting provisions that
were struck down in Madras Bar Association’21 for violating
the independence of the judiciary.
when was tribunal reforms act held
in 2021
quasi judicial bodys